Company says it cracked open the Hotmail account of an unnamed blogger
involved in a Windows 8 espionage case in part because he was selling Windows
Server activation keys.
Microsoft's Panos Panay proudly shows off the then-new Surface hardware at
the company's unveiling event at Chelsea Piers in New York, October 2012.
Microsoft defended what it called the "exceptional" step of a "limited
review" of a blogger's Hotmail account as part of a larger Windows espionage
case, saying it had caught the blogger selling Microsoft's intellectual property
without permission.
A court filing alleges that the unnamed blogger had been provided
prerelease Windows 8 RT source code by then-Microsoft employee Alex Kibkalo.
Kibkalo is being charged with stealing trade secrets.
The filing says that Microsoft triggered an internal investigation into the
blogger's actions when the blogger sent the source code to an unnamed person,
hoping for verification of its origins. Instead, that person tipped off
then-Windows chief Steven Sinofsky, who forwarded the details to Microsoft's
Trustworthy Computing Investigations department, which investigates external
threats and internal information leaks.
The March 17 filing (PDF) alleges that the unnamed blogger confessed to
selling Microsoft's intellectual property.
During his interview, the blogger admitted to posting information on Twitter
and his Web sites, knowingly obtaining confidential and proprietary Microsoft IP
from Kibkalo, and selling Windows Server activation keys on eBay.
Microsoft provided CNET with a statement defending its actions:
During an investigation of an employee, we discovered evidence that the
employee was providing stolen [intellectual property], including code relating
to our activation process, to a third party. In order to protect our customers
and the security and integrity of our products, we conducted an investigation
over many months with law enforcement agencies in multiple countries. This
included the issuance of a court order for the search of a home relating to
evidence of the criminal acts involved. The investigation repeatedly identified
clear evidence that the third party involved intended to sell Microsoft IP and
had done so in the past.
As part of the investigation, we took the step of a limited review of this
third party's Microsoft operated accounts. While Microsoft's terms of service
make clear our permission for this type of review, this happens only in the most
exceptional circumstances. We apply a rigorous process before reviewing such
content. In this case, there was a thorough review by a legal team separate from
the investigating team and strong evidence of a criminal act that met a standard
comparable to that required to obtain a legal order to search other sites. In
fact, as noted above, such a court order was issued in other aspects of the
investigation.
No comments:
Post a Comment